Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Carlson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1993No. G012399PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Defendants Mary A. Carlson, the City Clerk of Dana Point, and the City of Dana Point appeal from a judgment ordering Carlson to certify a referendum petition to the city council that challenges the council’s passage of a resolution adopting a general plan and a local coastal program land use plan amendment (hereafter the plan). The primary issue is whether the referendum is invalid under Elections Code section 4052 1 because plaintiffs failed to attach a copy of the plan to their petition.
Facts
Dana Point is a general law city incorporated on January 1,1989. Defendant Carlson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mervyn's v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chandis Securities Co. v. City of Dana PointCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lin v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Browne v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hebard v. BybeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.