Legal Opinion
Chandis Securities Co. v. City of Dana Point
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1996No. G018098PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J.
Plaintiffs Chandis Securities Company, M. H. Sherman Company and Sherman Foundation sued defendants the City of Dana Point and its city council seeking to invalidate the results of two referendums by which the city’s electorate failed to approve the adoption of a specific plan and a general plan amendment relating to plaintiffs’ property, and to allow development of the land. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs contend the rejection of the referendums exceeded the city’s police powers, violated…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Balasubramanian v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Mola Development Corp. v. City of Seal BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- North Pacifica, LLC. v. City of PacificaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.