Legal Opinion

Assembly v. Deukmejian

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1982No. S.F. 24348, 24349; S.F. 24354; S.F. 24356PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

These consolidated mandate proceedings raise difficult questions concerning referenda challenges to the 1981 Congressional, Senate and Assembly reapportionment statutes passed by a majority of the Legislature and signed by the Governor. (Stats. 1981, chs. 535, 536, 537.)(1) Are the referendum petitions defective because, in violation of Elections Code section 3516, subdivision (c), they required the signer to use his or her “address as registered to vote” rather than “residence address,” thereby making it impossible for election officials to determine if the signers were…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Senate of the State of Cal. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API