Ley v. Dominguez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner request a writ of mandate directing the city clerk of the city of Los Angeles to examine certain referendum petitions according to law, in order to determine whether the same are signed by the requisite number of qualified electors, and to certify the results of his examination to the city council. By stipulation it was agreed that, subject to the terms of the stipulation, the findings of fact in certain action entitled Woodward v. Dominguez should be deemed to be the facts in this proceeding and determinative of all issues of fact herein presented. As disclosed from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McClure v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.