Legal Opinion
Browne v. Russell
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1994No. B078417PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
Appellants Nancy Russell, City Clerk of the City of Los Angeles (the Clerk), and Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, American Lung Association of Los Angeles County, Inc., and Marilyn Jennett (interveners) appeal from a writ of mandate issued in favor of respondents Gregory Q. Browne, Fredric A. Shinerock and Maurice Prince. In its order, the superior court declared unconstitutional section 339 of the City of Los Angeles Election Code.
The question presented is whether, as applied, an ordinance requiring that circulators of referendary petitions be residents and registered voters…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDowell Mountain Ranch Land Coalition v. VizcainoArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Mapstead v. AnchundoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rubalcava v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- KZPZ Broadcasting, Inc. v. Black Canyon City Concerned CitizensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- D'AGOSTINO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.