Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. MacUra
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 16, 1940No. 29358PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
The city of Tulsa appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of Dolly Macura in her action against the defendant city for damages for injuries sustained by reason of alleged negligence of the defendant to maintain a sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition for public use.
It is alleged in the petition, and the proof shows, substantially the following facts: That on the 21st day of May, 1937, the date of the injury complained of, the defendant maintained a concrete sidewalk in the 400 block along the east side of Boston avenue, which extends north and south through the city; that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Town of Fairfax v. GiraudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- City of Tulsa v. WhittenhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Sherwood Forest No. 2 Corp. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Hart v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Oklahoma Transp. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.