Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Wells

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1920No. 10586PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Paul Wells, a minor, by Catherine Wells, his mother and next friend, against the City of Tul'sa for damages for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county, Hon. Ernest B..Hughes, Judge.

On May 10,1918, this action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, by Paul Wells, a minor, by Catherine Wells, his mother and his next friend, as plaintiff, against the city of Tulsa, as defendant. For the sake of convenience the parr ties will be hereinafter referred to as they respectively appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for certain personal injuries which he alleged that he received upon the streets of the city of Tulsa on the 14th day of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. O'NEIL v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API