Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Whittenhall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1929No. 18403PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This was an action by A. W. Whittenhall against the city of Tulsa for damages on account of certain personal injuries which he received in falling through the covering of a storm sewer catch basin in one of the streets of that city. The basis of the negligence was that the city, through its employees, placed and permitted a defective lid to remain on the catch basin opening. The defect consisted in the lid being too small.

At the time of the injury the plaintiff was assisting in laying some concrete or stone work near the scene of the catch basin. He left the place where he had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. City of Kingfisher v. AltizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. McCabe v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. City of Tulsa v. MacUraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Olmstead v. ReedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API