Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Porter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1988No. 60253PublishedCited by 217 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

The petitioner, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action, challenges the constitutionality of the three-year proviso in 76 O.S.1981 § 18 which limits the scope of recoverable damages when an action is brought more than three years from the date of the injury. She asserts that § 18 violates [1] the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution by penalizing only victims of health care providers’ malpractice without a corresponding penalty for victims of other tortfeasors; [2] Oklahoma’s constitutional prohibition against special laws limiting civil actions, Art. 5, § 46,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API