Reynolds v. Porter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The petitioner, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action, challenges the constitutionality of the three-year proviso in 76 O.S.1981 § 18 which limits the scope of recoverable damages when an action is brought more than three years from the date of the injury. She asserts that § 18 violates [1] the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution by penalizing only victims of health care providers’ malpractice without a corresponding penalty for victims of other tortfeasors; [2] Oklahoma’s constitutional prohibition against special laws limiting civil actions, Art. 5, § 46,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.