Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Transp. Co. v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1953No. 35559PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH,’ Justice.

The plaintiff’s petition charged negligence on the part of the defendants in certain acts, and whereby ’bodily injury and pain and loss of physical fitness to perform labor resulted to the plaintiff.

In final paragraph of the petition it is stated:

“Wherefore, plaintiff prays judgment in the amount of $25,000.00 and for her costs.”

The defendants, for answer, denied generally the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition and pleaded contributory negligence and unavoidable accident.

At the 'beginning of the trial the defendants objected to the introduction of any evidence on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. City of Tulsa v. MacUraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Harmon v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Newport Construction Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Karriman v. Orthopedic ClinicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. Jackson v. GlasgowCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Maples v. BryceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API