Legal Opinion

DiFrancesco v. Excam, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1994No. 01091PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Excam, Inc., Joffee’s Gun Shop, Inc., and RSR Wholesale Guns, Inc., appeal following a jury award of $125,000.00 in favor of appellees. Appellants were held responsible for the injuries sustained by Charles DiFrancesco after the Excam TA38S derringer hand pistol he was carrying in a sweater pocket accidentally discharged. The jury held appellants liable on a theory that the pistol was defectively designed and manufactured. Appellants maintain that they were entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Their arguments lack merit, and we affirm.

In this appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Putt v. Yates-American MacHine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API