Legal Opinion

Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag Aktiengesellschaft

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1989No. 62 E.D. Appeal Docket, 1988PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal presents a single issue: whether Superior Court exceeded the scope of its review when it reversed the trial court and directed entry of judgment n.o.v. in favor of Eaton Corporation. 361 Pa.Super. 137, 522 A.2d 52.

Harold Wenrick, a mechanic first class employed by Cerro Metal Products Company in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, was killed while he was engaged in repairing an extrusion press at the Cerro plant. The press operates by taking large cylinders of heated brass, called billets, and pushing them through a container, forcing the malleable brass through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. La Frankie v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API