Legal Opinion

Dambacher by Dambacher v. Mallis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1985No. 2813 and 3148PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is a products liability case arising out of an automobile accident. The product in question is a radial tire, and the allegations are that the tire was defective because it was not embossed with a warning not to mix it with non-radial tires, and that the accident occurred because the tire was mixed with non-radial tires.

Appellees, Joann Dambacher and her parents, were the plaintiffs, and appellant, Sears, Roebuck and Company, the supplier of the tire, was one of the defendants. A jury returned a verdict in favor of appellees. The trial court denied appellant’s…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Lewis v. Rego Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API