Legal Opinion

Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1978No. S.F. 23519PublishedCited by 541 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, Acting C. J.

In August 1970, plaintiff Ray Barker was injured at a construction site at the University of California at Santa Cruz while operating a high-lift loader manufactured by defendant Lull Engineering Co. and leased to plaintiff’s employer by defendant George M. Philpott Co., Inc. Claiming that his injuries were proximately caused, inter alia, by the alleged defective design of the loader, Barker instituted the present tort action seeking to recover damages for his injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by541 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

536 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API