Legal Opinion

Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1997No. 68 E.D.1996PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred when it admitted “lack of prior claims” evidence. We conclude the Superior Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision to admit such evidence, and therefore, we affirm.

Appellants, Francis and Louise Spino (“the Spinos”) purchased a type 3 ordinary household ladder in 1986 from a paint store. The ladder was manufactured by Appellee John S. Tilley Ladder Company (“Tilley”) and was designed to accommodate ordinary household use restricted to a 200 pound weight bearing load.1 Francis Spino testified that he…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Paul R. Forrest v. Beloit Corporation Harnischfeger Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API