Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
This case calls upon our Court to clarify the circumstances under which a trial court may, rather than awarding a new trial, mold a verdict to reflect the jury’s intent. After careful deliberation, we hold that in cases in which liability is free from doubt and the jury’s intent may be clearly discerned from the verdict, a trial court may, at its discretion, mold the verdict.
On August 24, 1987, while working as a rustproofer for Pro-Tech, Inc., Scott Men-dralla was severely injured when a vehicle under which he was working fell from a hydraulic lift. As a consequence of this acci*483…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Wagner v. Anzon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Botek v. Mine Safety Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Betz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Charlton v. Toyota Industrial EquipmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.