Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2005PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this products liability action, the issue we decide is whether expert reports, summarizing studies of hundreds of other accidents, are admissible as evidence of a defendant’s state of mind. We hold that, since the reports did not satisfy the “substantial similarity” test applicable to other accident evidence, they are not admissible. Because admission of the reports was reversible error, we remand for a new trial.

¶ 2 On March 1, 1999, Ryan Hutchinson was driving an eighteen-wheel tractor trailer when the trailer left the roadway, hit a guardrail and rolled down an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. SHV Coal, Inc. v. Continental Grain Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Bombar v. West American Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Empire Trucking Co. v. Reading Anthracite Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API