Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 20, 2004No. 03-0692/AFPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case concerns whether the staff judge advocate and convening authority were disqualified from participating in the post-trial review due to an article that the base newspaper published about Appellant’s court-martial. During Appellant’s sentencing hearing, the military judge suppressed adverse personnel records due to careless mistakes in their preparation. The trial counsel wrote an article for the base newspaper warning commands of the consequence of shoddy personnel records. The article suggested a negative view of Appellant and his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. BonoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. RiceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. StefanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. SonegoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. DanleyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
- United States v. Guzman2U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.