Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 12, 1999No. 99-0002; CrimApp. No. 32773PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge COX

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant has petitioned this Court for a grant of review, contending that prejudicial *297error occurred when the staff judge advocate (SJA) failed to discuss a recommendation by the military judge that the convening authority waive a portion of the forfeitures. Pursuant to provident pleas of guilty, appellant was convicted of multiple specifications of child sexual abuse, in violation of Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920, 925, and 934, respectively. He was sentenced by the military judge sitting alone to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. BonoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. ClearUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. FinsterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API