Legal Opinion
United States v. Hull
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 10, 2011No. 11-0131/AFPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge EFFRON delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, convicted Appellant, pursuant to mixed pleas, of dereliction of duty (providing alcohol to a minor), rape, and adultery, in violation of Articles 92, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 920, 934 (2006). The sentence adjudged by the court-martial and approved by the convening authority included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for three years, and reduction to E-l. The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. Michael S. BegnaudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. ScaffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. RuizCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. BarryNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. CallowayUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. GereUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. Harris Jr.United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.