Legal Opinion

United States v. Danley

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 8, 2011No. NMCCA 201000677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

BEAL, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of unauthorized absence and missing movement by design in violation of Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 887. The military judge sentenced the appellant to 90 days confinement, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge. A convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged and, except for the punitive discharge, ordered it executed. In accordance with a pretrial agreement, the convening authority…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. MarcumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ConradNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. ConradNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. QuallsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  4. United States v. SimondsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  5. United States v. TaylorNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API