Legal Opinion
United States v. Stefan
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 29, 2010No. 10-0349/ARPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether the chief of military justice was disqualified from preparing the addendum to the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR) because, before trial, she had caused the charges to be served on the accused. We hold that she was disqualified under Article 6(e), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 806(c) (2006), and Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1106(b), but Appellant was not prejudiced. 1
I
A
On August 20, 2008, Appellant damaged a door and some ceiling tiles, among other things, to obtain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. ArnoldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Bailey, Jr.Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. BatchelderNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. ChandlerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.