Chatfield v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action for damages arising ont of a contract authorizing plaintiffs’ assignor to sell certain real property. The trial was by the court without a jury and plaintiffs had judgment, from which defendant appeals. There is a bill of exceptions, prepared by plaintiffs, to show that all of paragraph VI and part of paragraph XI of the complaint was stricken out on motion of defendant. But plaintiffs do not appeal, and the part stricken out does not impair the complaint and need be no further noticed.
The appeal is in fact upon the judgment-roll alone. The verified complaint alleges in substance as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Alameda County v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bank of Woodland v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Johnson v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Perry v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kalmus v. Cedars of Lebanon HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.