Legal Opinion
Biurrun v. Elizalde
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1925No. Docket No. 2976PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The complaint alleges that defendants, within two years immediately preceding the commencement of this action, became indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $6,300 for and on account of money “had and received by said defendants to the use of and benefit of plaintiff,” etc., that said sum “and the whole thereof is still due, owing and unpaid.”
The defendants Ramirez and Elizalde filed separate answers to the complaint. The former denied that he became indebted to plaintiff in the sum alleged in the complaint, or in any other sum, within “the two years last past immediately preceding the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Chatfield v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- McGraw v. Friend & Terry Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Wilcox v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Antonio Meléndez v. CividanesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- J. C. Wattenbarger & Sons v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.