Johnson v. Klein
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The action was brought to recover the proceeds of an execution sale of certain goods belonging to the assignor of the plaintiff, on the ground that the judgment under which the sale was made was obtained through the fraudulent collusion of the defendant and the assignor, and was in fraud of the creditors of the latter. The findings were that all and singular the averments of the complaint are true.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The action was brought to recover the proceeds of an execution sale of certain goods belonging to the assignor of the plaintiff, on the ground that the judgment under which the sale was made was obtained through the fraudulent collusion of the defendant and the assignor, and was in fraud of the creditors of the latter. The findings were that all and singular the averments of the complaint are true. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
It has been so often held here that a finding that all the averments of the complaint are true is a sufficient finding of facts that an appeal grounded on its *187alleged insufficiency must be held to have been taken for delay. The answer contained nothing but denials and an admission of matters alleged in' the complaint, so that the finding that all of the allegations of the complaint are true necessarily covers all of the issues made by the pleadings.
Judgment affirmed, with fifty dollars• damages.
McKinstry, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.
2Cited by19 opinions
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hammitt v. Virginia Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Turner v. CyrusOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Williams v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McKelvey v. WagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.