Legal Opinion

Maeder Steel Products Co. v. Zanello

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The sum of $13,033.75, being the total averred value of the wares and merchandise sold by the plaintiff to the defendants at the times mentioned in the complaint, is made up of the following items: $11,150, cost of reinforcing steel supplied by the plaintiff to the defendants in the construction of the Labor Temple in Portland, Oregon; $133.75, amount due and owing to plaintiff from defendants on an existing open account at the time this action was filed; and $1,750, amount due and owing plaintiff from defendants for steel girders supplied by plaintiff to defendants. Regarding the last two…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API