Legal Opinion

Bank of Woodland v. Treadwell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,326PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Sixth District Court, County of Yolo. Denson, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgage contained the following provision: “And we do hereby agree that in case of a foreclosure of this mortgage, the holders thereof shall be entitled to recover upon this security the sum of $100, United States gold coin, as counsel fees, in addition to costs allowed by law.”

The answer contains the averment that the attorney for the plaintiff herein is a regular paid employd of plaintiff, employed by it to perform such legal business, conveyancing, and searching of records, as may be required of him, and receives for all his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Alameda County v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API