Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 22, 1964No. 17,295PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

This appeal concerns the effect of “Additional Instructions for Court Members” issued before trial by the staff legal officer of the convening authority to members of the court-martial that tried the accused. At trial, defense counsel moved for a change of venue or for a mistrial because of alleged improper matter in the instructions. A great deal of the pamphlet is within the scope of permissible orientation of prospective court members to acquaint them with the nature and importance of a court-martial and their individual responsibilities. See United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. LittriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. WallaceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API