United States v. Daigle
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*517OPINION OF THE COURT
Cook, Judge:
Dissatisfied with the "mediocre” quality of the officers called for court-martial service under a system operating through the office of the adjutant general, the commander at Fort Lewis, Washington, approved a different method of selection. At his trial by general court-martial sometime later, the accused challenged the new system as violative of Article 25(d)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 825(d)(2). The military judge overruled the challenge. The correctness of that ruling is the subject of this appeal.
Article 25(d)(2) provides, in part, that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. PearsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. RolandCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.