Legal Opinion

United States v. Daigle

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 22, 1975No. 29,340PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*517OPINION OF THE COURT

Cook, Judge:

Dissatisfied with the "mediocre” quality of the officers called for court-martial service under a system operating through the office of the adjutant general, the commander at Fort Lewis, Washington, approved a different method of selection. At his trial by general court-martial sometime later, the accused challenged the new system as violative of Article 25(d)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 825(d)(2). The military judge overruled the challenge. The correctness of that ruling is the subject of this appeal.

Article 25(d)(2) provides, in part, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. PearsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  4. United States v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. RolandCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API