Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rinehart

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 15, 1957No. 9647PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

This case requires us to revisit a familiar scene we had recently left in United States v Fowle, 7 USCMA 349, 22 CMR 139; United States v Estrada,

7 USCMA 635, 23 CMR 99; and United States v Holmes, 7 USCMA 642, 23 CMR 106. In those cases it was the trial counsel’s reference, during the presenteneing proceedings, to the Secretary of the Navy’s Instructions regarding separation from the service of persons convicted of larceny, which we found objectional. Here, however, it is prosecution’s reference to paragraph 33h, Manual for Courts-Martial, United…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. FoutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API