Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial and a cross-appeal by defendant from judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action in quantum meruit.
Facts
Plaintiff brought this action to recover $37,500 alleged to be due to plaintiff from defendant for personal services rendered to defendant by plaintiff at the special instance and request of defendant. The form of the complaint is in assumpsit. The background details of defendant’s corporate formation as the ultimate vehicle for accomplishment of a venture in which plaintiff, Harold L. Heathman and Esther Peister were joined…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Wind v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Brainard v. De La MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Frisk v. MerrihewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987