Legal Opinion

Stickel v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1987No. A035933PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

196 Cal.App.3d 575 (1987)

242 Cal. Rptr. 88

NANCY STICKEL, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH M. HARRIS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. A035933.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

November 24, 1987.

COUNSEL

Wayne L. Bender, L. Joanne Sakai and Rosenblum, Parish & Bacigalupi for Defendants and Appellants.

Wayne H. Thomas for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

POCHE, J.

The issue presented is whether a loan bearing a 30 percent annual rate of interest obtained by a licensed real estate broker on behalf of himself and certain fellow partners and joint venturers is…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Braman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Onofrio v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Del Mar v. CaspeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API