Legal Opinion

Brainard v. De La Montanya

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1941No. Sac. 5389PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of Bennett Distilling Company, a corporation, brought this action against defendants Pierre De La Montanya and his wife, seeking to establish an alleged trust and to recover alleged secret profits. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals from said judgment.

The controversy arose out of the business dealings over a period of years of defendant Pierre De La Montanya. In 1920 said defendant, together with E. J. O’Brien and E. A. Groezinger, entered into a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Palace Cafe Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. First Nat. Bank of Burns v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Miller v. South Hills Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Baker v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. Puget Sound Biscuit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  2. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McDonnell v. American Leduc Petroleums, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Gray v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API