Legal Opinion
Jogani v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 2008No. B206854PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
The trial court determined that plaintiff Shashikant Jogani had no right to a jury trial on his claims for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment, and the court entered an order striking his request for jury trial. Jogani 1 petitioned this court for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order. We conclude that the trial court erred because quantum meruit is an action at law and thus carries with it the right to a jury trial. 2 We therefore grant the petition.
BACKGROUND
The facts as alleged in the second amended complaint are as follows; Jogani began…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.