Legal Opinion

Vangel v. Vangel

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1953No. Civ. 19180PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The parties, who are brothers, entered into a partnership agreement in May, 1944, in contemplation of the purchase of the Cascade Ranch of some 330 acres. Approximately one half thereof consisted of producing orange' and lemon groves. Each was to furnish his pro rata share of the down payment. It was provided, however, that in the event one of the group could not otherwise raise his one third of such required payment and one of the other brothers should advance sufficient money to pay the same, . the one for whom the advance should be made would execute a promissory note for such amount,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Zeibak v. NasserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Wind v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Barron v. KoenigIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API