Legal Opinion

Frisk v. Merrihew

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1974No. Civ. 32454PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

Plaintiff Richard M. Frisk appeals from a judgment entered on a directed verdict denying him recovery in a defamation action.

The settled statement submitted on appeal pursuant to rule 7 of the California Rules of Court indicates that appellant was a certificated high school teacher in the Richmond Unified School District and a duly licensed California attorney, while respondent was the appointed superintendent of the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, California (“Diablo School District”) and the secretary of the school board. On August 1, 1967, the Diablo School…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Imig v. FerrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Copp v. PaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Cuenca v. Safeway San Francisco Employees Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API