Wood, Curtis & Co. v. El Dorado Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. J. Bartnett, Chas. A. Gray, and Chas. A. Swisler, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The facts involved in this appeal, briefly stated, are as follows: On February 17, 1904, the defendant and appellant herein, the El Dorado Lumber Company, entered into a contract with the defendants Carney, Roy & Carney for the construction of a single-track railroad, upon a private right of way from North Placerville to its storage yards in El Dorado County. Thereafter, and during the progress of construction work upon said right of way, the plaintiff corporation let to the firm of Carney, Roy & Carney, fifty-three head of horses, with their harness, at the rate of ten dollars per month for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- C.A. MacOmber v. L. M. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Clark v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by19 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Sherman v. Am. Sur. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Bricker v. Rollins & JareckiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Neil F. Lampson Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. v. West Pasco Water System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Ryan v. ShannahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.