McClain v. Hutton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinions rendered in Bank and in Department. William H. Jordan, and Coglan & Harvey, for Charlotte A. Hutton, Appellant. Raleigh Barcar, for Continental Building and Loan Association, Appellant, and Mary E. McClain, Respondent.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] A rehearing of this cause in Bank was ordered, on the ground, among others, that the work done and materials furnished by the defendants Holt and Chandler were commenced prior to the date of the mortgage of the Continental Building and Loan Association, and not afterward, as stated in the decision heretofore filed. Hence, assuming the claims of these defendants to be valid, a new trial of the case as to them will be unnecessary. This renders necessary an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Jewell v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Wylie v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Gilbert Hunt Co v. ParryWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Hill v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Simons Brick Co. v. HetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.