Legal Opinion

Adams v. Burbank

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1894No. 19324PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This action was brought by J. F. Adams, the respondent, to recover from appellant the sum of four thousand seven hundred and forty-four dollars and sixty-four cents, with interest and costs, for work, labor, and services performed and materials furnished in the construction of a brick building in the city of Los Angeles.

It is conceded by the pleadings that on the first day of June, 1891, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, by the terms of which the former was to furnish the material, labor, and work, as specified in certain specifications and shown by the…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API