C.A. MacOmber v. L. M. Bigelow
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Sea well, Judge. - The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The COURT.
—William Belyea and J. C. Rogers entered into a written contract with defendant Bigelow to construct for her a building of eight flats on Bush street, in San Francisco. This contract was void for want of filing in the office of the county recorder. The assignor of plaintiff Macomher, Thomas Madig^n, the assignor of plaintiff Reid, S. H. Depuy, and plaintiff Tuttle, as subcontractors, each performed and supplied labor and furnished materials in the construction of said building, and filed liens on the property, and each of the plaintiffs began a suit to foreclose his lien. These…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Schuchart v. SchuchartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- State v. LongstrethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.