Legal Opinion

Clark v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1903No. Sac. No. 993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J.—

This is an action to foreclose an alleged lien upon a threshing-machine, brought under the act of March 12, 1885, providing a lien for the wages of persons employed as laborers on threshing-machines. (Stats. 1885, 109.) The complaint contains three counts, the first to recover for labor performed by the plaintiff, the other two upon claims assigned to the plaintiff by others who performed work .in connection with the machine. The appeal is taken by the Best Manufacturing Company from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

1. The threshing-machine in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duncan v. HawnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. El Dorado Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lembke Construction Co. v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Proctor v. ArakelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Vollmer Clearwater Co. v. Union Warehouse & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API