Sherman v. Am. Sur. Co. of N.Y.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, as assignee of certain materialmen and laborers, brought this action against the defendant as surety upon a bond given by S. F. Loftus, a contractor, to the city of Long Beach, to recover payment of certain amounts alleged to be due to such materialmen and laborers from the contractor for work performed and material furnished in the construction of two wells for said city.
At the time of entering into the contract, on July 22, 1912, Loftus, pursuant to the provisions of an act of the legislature, designated as chapter 140, Statutes of 1897, gave a bond in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bricker v. Rollins & JareckiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.