Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1942No. Civ. 11655PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Idonah Slade Perkins, brought this action against defendant, Benquet Consolidated Mining Company, to recover from defendant the dividends declared by defendant on certain shares of its capital stock alleged by plaintiff to be her property. Defendant’s basic defense to this action is that, under Philippine law, which it claims controls, Eugene Arthur Perkins, husband of plaintiff, is entitled to such dividends. The trial court ruled, in accordance with plaintiff’s contentions, that the issue as to who had title to the stock, as to who was entitled to the dividends, and as to what…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API