Legal Opinion

Stoltenberg v. Harveston

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1934No. S. F. 14799PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action for unlawful detainer by the landlord against tenants holding over after default in the payment of rent. ' The defense to the action was that the landlord orally reduced the rent from $675 per month to $300. This latter sum was paid monthly by the lessees from the date of the lease to and including April 1, 1932. As the rent was payable in advance, the payment on April 1, 1932, covered the whole month of April. On May 7th following, the landlord served notice on the tenants that the rent of "said premises for the month of May, 1932, amounting to $675, due May 1, 1932, under the terms…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pacific Magnesium, Inc. v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Cirimele v. ShinazyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Dallman Supply Co. v. Smith-Blair, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API