Legal Opinion

James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1919No. Civ. No. 2741PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Action by a lessor for the collection of delinquent rent, against its lessee and two sureties upon a bond guaranteeing the faithful performance on the part of said lessee of the covenants of a written lease. The lessee suffered default and the action was tried as against the sureties alone. Judgment was rendered against both sureties, from which one of them appeals. The appellant urges three grounds for reversal, which will be considered in the order in which they are made.

[1] It is claimed that the bond executed by appellant is void because "it was entered into contrary to express statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Brown v. Board of Education of City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Power County v. Evans Bros. Land & Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water LaundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Modoc County Bank v. RinglingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API