Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estate of McDougald

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1905No. Sac. No. 1290PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This ease presents two appeals by Carrie B. McDougald from the order settling her second account as administratrix of the estate—one taken by her as administratrix, the 'other as the holder of a claim secured by mortgage.

The entire assets of the estate consist of the real estate covered by the mortgage held by Carrie B. McDougald, $6,822.95, received by her after her appointment, as rentals of said real estate, and five hundred dollars received on a life-insurance policy. I

1. The principal point urged by the administratrix in her representative capacity is the action of the court in rejecting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Angelus Cloak Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Saltares v. KristovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. G. S. Johnson Co. v. Nevada Packard Mines Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API