Legal Opinion

Klein Norton Co. v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1930No. Docket No. 5978PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GATES, J., pro tem.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment in favor of respondent in the sum of $609.04. The action is for money due on a mutual open and current account. Prior to July, 1923, appellant had been employed by respondent as a salesman in certain territory in southern California. He was employed upon a commission varying from three and one-half per cent to one per cent of the gross sales. In July, 1923, while appellant was spending his vacation in San Bernardino County, L. J. Kauffman, sales manager of respondent, wrote a letter to him wherein it was stated that respondent would…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hunter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API