Legal Opinion

Julian v. Gold

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11276PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Action by landlord against tenants for rent. Judgment for plaintiff; defendants appeal. The facts are not in dispute.

On July 24, 1923, N. Julian, the husband and assignor of plaintiff, as lessor, made a lease to defendants of certain business property in San Pedro, Los Angeles County, for the period of five years from December 2, 1923. The agreed rental was $6,000 per annum for the first two years, $7,000 per annum for the next two years and $7,500 per annum for the last year; rent to be paid monthly in advance. Defendants lived up faithfully to the terms of the lease until October 10, 1925,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McKenzie v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Torrey v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Angel v. MurraySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API