Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Smyth

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1972No. Civ. 28254PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Plaintiffs, the makers of a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust on property which they purchased from the defendant, have appealed from a judgment which (a) failed to grant than a permanent injunction against a threatened sale under the deed of trust because of their failure to pay principal and interest on the note / according to its terms, (b) discharged, subject to a new injunction pendente lite to cover the period of appeal, a preliminary injunction previously granted, (c) adjudged that plaintiffs are obligated to pay defendant according to the terms of the…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Nevin v. SalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API