Legal Opinion
Dallman Supply Co. v. Smith-Blair, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1951No. Civ. 14472PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J.—
Plaintiff Dallman Supply Company is a corporation engaged principally in the business of selling plumbing supplies. It is the successor of a partnership which did business under the same name. Defendant Smith-Blair, Inc., is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of waterworks equipment. In 1944 Dallman Supply Company, then a partnership, engaged one Harden as manager of a waterworks department and negotiations were entered into with defendant for an exclusive agency in Northern California for the distribution of defendant’s products. On October 20,1944, acting for plaintiff,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Barlow v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Beatty v. Oakland Sheet Metal Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hofland v. GustafsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.